Blog

Trading through the use of algorithms has become a common practice in the last couple of decades. It has revolutionized how traders engage in executing orders by increasing the speed and volume of trades. A growing concern that has also come with the adoption of algorithmic trading is its importance, fairness, and stability in the market. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) therefore has set rules to govern the application of algorithms in regards to trading. This piece explores two specific aspects of SEC regulation that have a strong influence on algorithmic trading and will be useful for the traders to ensure compliance so as to avoid any legal consequences.

1. Role Played by the SEC in the Practice of Algorithmic Trading

The ultimate goal of the SEC is to ensure that markets in the United States are fair and effective. Its core activities aim at protecting the interest of the investors, maintaining the integrity of the market and encouraging capital creation. Given the increasing dependence on algorithm trading, the SEC from time to time has enacted and amended various regulations to mitigate specific threats posed by systematic trading including market abuse, excessive fluctuations, and error trading which are systemic risks of high magnitude.

Key Objectives of SEC Regulations:

Prohibition of abusive stock trading

Reduction of dangers arising from extreme automation

Guaranteeing visibility into trading operations

Facilitation of the orderly functioning of the markets

2. Important SEC Regulations which relate to Algorithmic Trading.

It will be recalled that a number of specific SEC regulations directly affect algorithmic trading. Some of the most pressing rules and guidelines that the trading algorithms and trading companies are expected to follow are given below.

A. Regulation NMS (National Market System)

In 2005, Regulation NMS was formed, primarily to enhance fairness and efficiency in the US equity markets. Initially, it wasn’t designed for algorithm trading, but NMS components influence the operation of algorithms in terms of trading, especially, in guaranteeing best execution of trades.

Key Provisions:

Order Protection Rule (Rule 611): This rule requires that transactions be performed at the best price available among all recognized as legitimate market centers while preventing investors from executing trades that may transact at worse prices.

Access Rule (Rule 610): Provides for equal opportunity for all traders irrespective of the venue where quotes are posted and prohibits practices that discriminate against certain categories of traders.

For algorithmic traders, Rule NMS assures them of competitive conditions without giving various algorithms ability to take advantage of price differences that exist among different exchanges.

B. Market Access Rule (Rule 15c3-5)

As announced in the first part of the paper, the Market Access Rule, which was introduced in 2010, is primarily focused on brokers and dealers who offer direct market access to trading customers. It is a requirement under this rule that every firm adopts risk management strategies that reduce the effects of erroneous trades and meet all relevant regulation requirements.

Essential Requirements:

Controls that are automated should be implemented for risk management to ensure that trades are not conducted that interfere with the functioning of the market.

Limitation of access to trading systems in such a way that only qualified persons have access to prevent unauthorized trading.

Minimize recurrence and conduct testing of risk controls.

The Market Access Rule, for example, seeks to guarantee that institutions engaging in algorithmic trading have mechanisms in place to minimize the occurrence of “fat-finger” mistakes or any unintended orders that may bring about disturbances in the market.

C. Regulation ATS (Alternative Trading Systems)

As mentioned previously, Regulation ATS deals with the non-exchange venues, namely dark pools, in addition to many other forms of alternative trading systems. Although Regulation ATS is meant for the venues only, algorithmic traders who trade in these venues are also impacted by it as they are actively engaging with these venues. Regulatory intervention through this rule seeks to reduce the risk of collusion and malpractices among the possible competitors in alternative trading venues.

Key Aspects:

Transparency: In particular, dark pools and every other ATS type have to comply with reporting obligations and also enhance their transparency towards the SEC.

Fair Access: Covers the respective access in the ATS systems for using the trading platform order placing focusing more on no preferential treatment of firstly few.

Reassuring that there are no unfair practices in other trading venues, Regulation ATS provides protection to all traders, even those who rely on algorithms.

D. Regulation SHO (Short Sale Rule)

Regulation SHO provides guidance on the rules that govern short selling which has its own consequences for algorithmic strategies that deploy short trades. It introduces certain limitations on short selling in order to avoid rapid and excessive declines and indeed in fact catastrophic market crashes facilitated by large short-sorting algorithmic strategies.

Key Features:

• Short Sale Circuit Breaker (Rule 201): It specifies that once a price of a stock declines by more than 10% during the trading day; that particular stock cannot be short sold again on that day.
• Locate and Close-out Requirements: This is the requirement that allows the investor bearish strategy to short wing horse stocks; it is critical that these stocks will be located and any attempts to short the stocks are closed out without undue; delays.

Indeed, traders who are algorithmic traders and decide to employ short selling strategies need to audit their algorithms in relation to these restrictions as well as reporting requirements to avoid any violation which could lead to certain sanctions.

E. SEC Rule 15c2-11: Improving access to information This rule obligates the brokers to be able to look for and put out relevant information regarding the particular securities so that the trades do not occur without these securities. This impacts primarily the over the counter markets but this rule is also applicable to algorithmic trading platforms whose markets are in the primary less regulated sectors.

Moving on to relevance for Algo Traders: This operates for OTC securities doesnt matter be it any Information it has to be in place but there are some penalties for not following such rules as fines and other penalties.

F. SCI Regulations Last year some regulations were revised and also the new ones applied – the 13th of last April in the year two thousand and fourteen Regulation SCI was adopted. This regulation was aimed at the exchanges, clearing agencies, and some ASPs, which had a high activity, including algorithmic traders. This rule is enacted to ensure the operational stability of critical systems of the market to avert system failure and malfunctioning of technological systems.

Requirements:

System Testing and Maintenance: Make sure that systems conform with all relevant performance parameters throughout testing until deployment always maintaining necessary security measures.

Incident Reporting: Timelines within firms for major breaches of systems and other major disruptivity incidents to the status quo have to be relayed to the SEC prominently.

All firms covered by Regulation SCI should comply with the provisions of Regulation SCI including those that operate algorithmic trading coverage under law.

3. Potential Risks and Challenges for Algorithm Traders

Algorithms operating under terms of algorithmic trading is experiencing lots of SEC regulations and covering additional measures that would sustain the integrity and fairness of the market, however, there are challenges that arise out of algorithmic trading such as;

Compliance Costs: There are implications as a result of that Sir. Look at SCI regulations or rules, Market Access Rule, and systems Ect. As a regulation gives rise to compliance related expenditure on systems integration, testing and monitoring.

Higher Regulations: Authorities are concentrating on firms using algorithmic trading due to the potential degree of the impact every error has and thus all companies are expected to adhere to stringent disclosure policies in aspects of trading.

Market Disturbances: Since algorithmic trading and trading algorithms usage is considerable in daily trading activities, firms have to ensure that their algorithms do not worsen the irregularities and conditions that may prompt regulations to be enforced are kept.

Future Regulatory Trends in Algorithmic Trading

The way things are presently it is clear that as algorithmic trading advances, so does the manner the SEC controls it. Some of these include the following:

Assured Focus on High-Frequency Trading (HFT): It is worth noting that such strategies are easier to regulate as they affect the general volatility and liquidity of the market. There are high possibilities of placing new stringent laws to restrict its activities; for instance new tax on transactions and speed bumps can be used to control its effectiveness.

Even More Security Regulations: As for compliance there are going to be additional laws to cater for the safety perimeters of the algorithmic trading companies as these systems are also contemplating target areas of possible cyberattacks. This may mean additional protective measures of information and reporting systems.

Mandatory Disclosure of Algorithms: Another possibility is that all firms will be required to publish their algorithmic trading program as a regulation targeting transparency that will prevent distortions of the market.

Conclusion

The SEC’s approach towards algorithmic trading regulation maintains fairness, transparency, and market safety despite the fast changing environment. For algorithmic traders, complying with these regulations is imperative to prevent facing fines or punishment. Educating themselves about key rules and concepts, including Regulation NMS, Market Access Rule, Regulation SCI and some other emerging regulatory development will make algorithmic traders operate sensibly in the financial space. Besides that, with compliance being considered, traders will be more able to leverage their algorithms instead of constantly focusing on their regulatory aspects.

To avail our algo tools or for custom algo requirements, visit our parent site Bluechipalgos.com