Position sizing can serve as a critical part of risk management in your trading systems, for instance in the management of margin accounts in finance. For quantitative traders, position sizing entails the computation of optimum size for each trade based on set rules or strategy. Position sizing when applied adequately can reduce level of risk exposure, improve returns and also assist in maintaining to a certain degree, a properly balanced portfolio.
Different strategies for position sizing which are consistent with the risk tolerances and strategic objectives of the trades have to be instituted. This can be done through the use of quantitative models by quant traders.
Why Position Sizing is Important
The importance of position sizing cannot be overemphasized. The performance and risk characteristics of any trading strategy are derived from the position sizing of the trades that are pitched by the strategy. Sub-optimal size may cause over leverage risk where excessive risk is taken, conversely sub-optimal size may lead to reduced profitability as a conservative fabrication is maintained. Adhering to a balanced approach guarantees that:
Controlled Drawdowns: It helps decrease the probabilities of enduring large losses within the portfolio.
Maximized Returns: It helps ensure that the company or trader’s capital is optimally utilized in order to seize the opportunities available.
Consistent Execution: The discipline of following rules is natural so the chances of emotions interfering with execution and planning is eliminated.
Position Sizing Techniques
1. Fixed Dollar Amount
This is a very basic scaling system whereby a certain amount of investment is made in every trade made by a trader irrespective of the characteristics of a trade or the total portfolio value.
Pros: it is very simple to use and comprehend.
Cons: May leave exposure that varies considerably un-hedged due to the fact that the degrees of risk and volatility of the trade are not taken into consideration.
Example: If each trade has $5000 worth of allocated capital, it means that irrespective of the risk of the asset being traded on the geared in instruments, the same amount of dollars is allocated on the asset during trading.
2. Fixed Fractional Position Sizing
Username Allocates Risks Commentary: Leverage employing a fixed fraction of the total portfolio on every trade, in this case, this leads to a percentage allocated for the trade according to the risk the trader is willing to take.
Pros: Will maintain proportional risk because the position will continue adjusting to changes in the portfolio value
Cons: May lead to very tiny positions in a declining portfolio
Example: If the allocation is set to 2% on a 100000 portfolio, it indicates a risk of 2000 per trade. Thus if the portfolio increases to 150000. then the allocation also goes to 3000.
3. Volatility-Based Position Sizing
This is the technique that has the rigging of size of the trade with volatility of that specific asset. Which means the highly variable assets will be given lower allocation while the stable ones will have greater proportions.
Pros: It helps in the reduction of the risk across the trades by incorporating the volatilities of the assets
Cons: Needs to incorporate alterations constantly and needs to get the volatility institutions quite exact
Example: A stock with vol of 20% will probably have a position half of stock’s with a vol of 10%
4. Kelly Criterion
The Kelly Criterion is pronounced primarily as Kelly’s Formula whose scope heads into the option markets for example in this case, a formulation that determines the perfect bet size, as in proportion of the entire bankroll for a specific trade in order to maximize its growth in the long term. It includes the odds of winning a given trade and the ratio of the potential returns against the risk incurred.
Pros: Supposedly enables one to maximize growth while suppressing the probability of unnecessary losses.
Cons: Admittedly outstandingly difficult to calculate and exceedingly conservative in such circumstances.
Example: In the sense of a strategy which works about 60% of the time, and assumes a reward – risk ratio of 2:1, this means Kelly Criterion will advise taking a certain percentage of a portfolio to get the maximum possible returns.
5. Equal Risk Contribution
This method refers to the allocation of positions so that each position assumes the same risk in proportion to the total risk of the portfolio. It is often used in risk-parity strategies.
Pros: Guarantees complete elimination of risk bias towards assets.
Cons: Time-consuming and has high requirements on risk modelling.
Example: Combining a small percentage in high-risk assets into a big number on low-risk so that the effect of the risk in the aggregate will be equal.
6. Pyramiding
In this method, a position is scaled up at predefined profit targets, as the position appreciating in value moves in favor of the trader.
Pros: Traders can take advantage of the favorable trend and risk little at the beginning.
Cons: Perfect timing and discipline is sought after.
Example: Entering into fresh long by employing a small position and then building the position up by adding size when the trade makes money while using regular stop losses on each addition.
7. Maximum Drawdown Limitation
This procedure manages the size of positions taken by a trader such that the taking of the largest number of positions possible will still ensure that the worst case is better than the maximum drawdown an individual is willing to assume.
Pros: Protects from really disastrous losses.
Cons: Promotes timid trades even when the market is extremely volatile.
Example: If a maximum drawdown of 10% is acceptable for a trader, they would execute their trades in a manner so that no single trade would lead to an account loss greater than 2%.
Selecting Position Sizing Techniques
Position sizing techniques can be selected based on the following criteria:
Risk Tolerance: Conservative traders using fixed fractional or maximum drawdown techniques as their active risk management strategies are likely to be at an advantage while risk-seeking aggressive traders could prefer the Kelly Criterion.
The Nature of the Strategy: In the case of high-frequency trading strategies, a fixed dollar amount is very convenient while in the case of trend-following strategies, volatility based amount is highly used.
Portfolio Size: Bigger the portfolio, the better the risk management which is why in larger portfolios equal risk contribution can be used.
Market Environment: While the trader is present the market conditions are not constant and therefore volatile markets may require such techniques which adapt to the market.
Sourcing Errors in Position Size
Overleverage
There tends to be instances where bigger positions have been executed; when the times are hard then those positions are likely to incur massive losses.
Abuse of Position Size
Risk controls should always be accompanied by the necessary number of assets where an implementation of strategies meant to combative against losses is not in place.
Strategy Complexity
Complexity in systems can result in plenty of strategy errors losing massive profit opportunities which are mitigated by advanced techniques of arbitrage systems.
Position Sizing in Algorithmic Trading
Due to the fact that position sizing is a constant function of algorithmic models for quantitative traders, algorithms are designed to incorporate them. Algorithms can dynamically adjust sizes based on the:
Current volatility of the asset
Market conditions
Key performance indicators of the portfolio
Conclusion
To Conclude, position sizing is one of the main building blocks of successful trading. The right technique with the right way that it is incorporated within the strategy objectives will help quantitative traders generate added returns with lesser risks. That’s when be it the basic constant proportion of the overall capital strategy or more complicated risk-driven strategies, what is important is these methodologies work as intended every time. Ultimate sustainable trading growth depends on the prudent capital allocation across positions that optimally balances the risk and returns offered by each.
To avail our algo tools or for custom algo requirements, visit our parent site Bluechipalgos.com
Leave a Reply